A well-phrased excerpt from BJ (emphases mine):
“One crucial thing was over looked in this race to elevate women to bossiness. To escape the oppressive tyranny of PIV sex and let women be in charge. They failed to notice that it wasn’t being penetrated itself that was submissive. It was just that all femininity was equated with submission – that everything a woman did in sex had been made to look as if it was a priori submissive.
But there is no way that such simple basics – being the hole or the plug – are on their own submissive or dominant. It only has further meaning in context.
Sometimes it feels like femdom is a big mirror. You hold it up to the world and you see all kinds of yukky beliefs reflected by and clear. Like that bit in the Snow Queen or something.
But that’s the fact. Way back in the past when they invented misogyny they decided that women were lower status and thus had the low status role in sex. He had the mighty phallus – she had the dirty needy hole. You can see how femdom later thought, hey, lets flip this shit. Let’s make the guy be called slut for wanting and be filled. But those things aren’t really submissive. Having something pushed into your body that feels amazing is only submissive because someone decided that the female role in sex was a submissive one.
You don’t need to put the guy on the bottom because he is the bottom. It misses the fucking point. Fucking. Which is the point. Which feels good. Which doesn’t have an innate power exchange embedded in it.
Really. It just doesn’t.”
November 26, 2007 at 6:59 pm
I greatly hate making gender or position a statement of value or role. Which is probably why I like femme guys and very strong women.
People who break the mold.
November 26, 2007 at 9:47 pm
Hear, hear.
I am right there with ya.
June 5, 2008 at 9:56 am
Well said! I love fucking boys but it certainly doesn’t make me submissive.